It sounds as if the basic pieces are already there, such as built-in support for citations, and linking to citations & annotations, as well as link types to describe the nature of a link (“refutes”, “supports”, etc) – and a graph visualizing these links / relationships.
NVIVO VS MAXQDA SOFTWARE
It provides a process to teach the identification of analytic tasks and to translate them into appropriate software operations. I’d also be interested to eventually make my own app work for such a workflow. NVivo software is designed to help researchers organize, code, and analyze qualitative and mixed methods research data. Five-Level QDA is a method that can be used to ensure that learners fully appreciate that their methodology drives the analytic process, and not the capabilities of the software.
From your description it sounds as if a PKM solution (such as the great Obsidian kit by mentioned above) could be made to work for such a workflow as well. And then for that summary of issues/links/annotations to be created in as flexible/customizable way as possible so I can use it in a report or blog or book or ebook or all of the above. I did try out some of the open source options and felt that none were quite robust enough, but that’s changing and I’m hopeful that in a few years they will be as full-featured as these others.įor me what is most important is to be able to create issues and then related to those list URL links to related citations along with some text explaining how that item supports or refutes the issue at hand. (As powerful as it is, I just preferred Atlas!) That said, so many of the people I work with use NVivo that I may end up having to go with that even though I didn’t love working with it. Having tried them all very recently I’d say that Atlas.ti was the most aesthetically-pleasing and Mac-y for me, and I felt like the UI was most intuitive for my needs. It’s designed to help you organize, analyze and find insights in unstructured, or qualitative data like: interviews, open-ended survey responses, articles, social media and web content. I suspect depending on your needs (collaboration, for example, means you’ll need to have a team using the same one as you) and UI preferences you’ll naturally gravitate towards one. MAXQDA is a program designed to facilitate and support qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods research projects.
NVIVO VS MAXQDA LICENSE
With the other big three, I think it mostly comes down to preference, norms in your discipline, and price (they’re all expensive, but depending on which license you get there may be significant differences). Devonthink, as someone else mentioned, is great for aggregating documents I really wanted it to work for my QDA needs but it was much better for collection & storage than the more granular analysis phase.ĭedoose seems good, but after a friend of mine had catastrophic data loss with them in years past I have been pretty suspicious of it I know they have beefed up their infrastructure but it makes me wary. I recently went on a journey with respect to this.
0 kommentar(er)
